After 33 memorable years, Tom Larscheid is done as the Canucks colour commentator.

He was the colour-man on Vancouver hockey broadcasts for all but four NHL seasons since 1977, and for more than a generation of hockey fans Larscheid’s insight and instincts provided a blunt barometer of the team’s performance – good or bad.

“When you have a job you’ve loved each and every day, you’re sorry to give it up,” Larscheid said late Wednesday. “But the simple reality is I’m 70 years old and it’s time to pass the baton. It will be strange not to be up there in my perch during hockey season, but I’ve had a pretty good run.

“I’m grateful to the listeners and honoured to have worked with three of the very best play-by-play men in the business in Jim Robson, Jim Hughson and John Shorthouse. And Rick Ball is going to be right up there, too. I always called it the way I saw it and I had a lot of fun doing it. My only regret is I never got to say: ‘The Vancouver Canucks are Stanley Cup champions.’”

Larscheid said 1040 has been terrific to him and he leaves with no hard feelings after the station told him recently it was going with Tomlinson, a 41-year-old from North Vancouver who was a kid when Larscheid and Robson were often better than the hockey team they broadcast.

I wrote about Tommy a few years ago when he first thought about retirement. I’m grateful that he gave us Canucks fans 3 more seasons on the air after that and I wish he could’ve stayed one more, especially going into what is expected to be a big season for the team. But at the same time, I’m happy that Tommy finally decided – albeit helped, apparently, by Team 1040 management – to hang them up.

Good and bad, he entertained Canucks fans with a passion only Canucks fans could relate to and appreciate. Yes, he was a homer at times, but he was our homer. During games, he said things on-air that we would say in our living rooms. While Robson and Shorthouse were the voice of the Canucks, in many ways Tommy was the voice of the Canucks fan.

Dave Tomlinson has been tapped as Tommy’s replacement. In his few stints as the Canucks colour commentator (in Tommy’s relief), DT proved to be a decent analyst; however, it was also obvious that he has a way to go to match Tommy’s on-air passion. Just like when Shorthouse replaced Robson, Tomlinson has some big shoes to fill after Tommy.

Good luck and best wishes to both.

Share this post:
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • MySpace
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Yahoo! Bookmarks
  • Wikio
  • Digg
  • Technorati
  • del.icio.us
  • LinkedIn
  • Netvibes
  • email

Some good news from the Vancouver Canucks today:

The Vancouver Canucks in partnership with Rogers Sportsnet announced today that they have reached a three-year agreement to broadcast 13 regular season games a year on Rogers Sportsnet ONE, beginning in the 2010.11 National Hockey League season.

(skip)

This new partnership is in addition to Rogers Sportsnet Pacific’s 45 game Canucks broadcast schedule available to fans in British Columbia and the Yukon Territories. This is another extension of the strong strategic alliance with Rogers Communications.

A little bit more info about Rogers Sportsnet ONE here.

A quick look at the Canucks’ schedule this upcoming 2010/2011 season shows 15 games on Saturday night. Assuming these Saturday night games will be broadcast on Hockey Night in Canada – and I think most, if not all of them, should be – that’s a total of 73(-ish) games to be broadcast potentially on CBC, Rogers Sportsnet Pacific and Rogers Sportsnet ONE. TSN showed 10 Canucks games last season so it wouldn’t be a stretch to assume that TSN can pick up the remaining games. City-TV, another Rogers property, also broadcasted 1 game last season; I noticed Shaw added City-TV HD to its channel lineup not too long ago.

So what does this all mean?

The Canucks have always maintained that the only reason games were available only on pay-per-view was because they didn’t have a network to broadcast the games for them. And now that they do, well, simply, it’s no more pay-per-view.

Share this post:
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • MySpace
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Yahoo! Bookmarks
  • Wikio
  • Digg
  • Technorati
  • del.icio.us
  • LinkedIn
  • Netvibes
  • email
Jul 282010

Hidey ho folks! It’s bee a long, long time since you last saw me grace these pages. Much has happened since. The Blackhawks apparently won the Stanley Cup – I refuse to believe it happened. And I noticed that the design changed some – apparently we all like Shane O’Brien (it’s not like, but love with me.. love to hate him). Anyhoo, lets talk about what I stopped by for – Willie Mitchell’s role with the Canucks.

Now before you run me out of town, I completely understand that he’s an unrestricted free agent who is (depending on which reports you believe) still answering imaginary doorbells. I also understand that the Canucks blueline is so deep that many of you probably think that the best Willie could hope for (assuming he is re-signed) is to be the stick guy so he could get close to the bench. But I have a reasonable theory and I want you to hear me out.

Currently the Canucks have nine defensemen under contract – Dan Hamhuis ($4.5M), Keith Ballard ($4.2M), Kevin Bieksa ($3.75M), Sami Salo ($3.5M), Alex Edler ($3.25M), Christian Ehrhoff ($3.1M), Shane O’Brien ($1.6M), Andrew Alberts ($1.05M), and Aaron Rome ($750k). Right away, we can likely assume that Alberts is either going to need to find a good real estate agent in Winnipeg or make sure his passport is up-to-date. I’m also thinking that Bieksa is trade bait (even with Salo’s injury) as his dollars don’t make sense for someone who plays with dangerously sharp things. And with Salo gone, the Canucks lose what has been their veteran stalwart.

So where does Mitchell fit in?

If he is healthy (and that’s still a might big IF), I’d find it hard to believe that Mitchell wouldn’t want a shot to return to a cup contender. Furthermore, Willie would likely understand that he’d need a one year term to prove he’s still NHL-worthy and therefore carries low risk. Lastly, the fact he is an unknown entity means his dollar value will likely be significantly more affordable than his previous contract demanded. All-in-all, I figure Mitchell could easily be had for Alberts dollars on a “proving that I still have it” style contract.

In fact, I figure that Willie will be what the Canucks thought Mathieu Schneider was going to be last season – a reliable veteran defenseman who will do whatever it takes for the good of the team and bring added depth when the going gets tough. Someone you know you can count on. A good ol’ boy.

So there you have it. Am I crazy? Or should I be expecting a call from Gillis to discuss my ideas further?

(Editor’s note: Because Mitchell has appeared in more than 400 NHL games and spent more than 100 days on injured reserve last season, he is eligible to sign a contract containing performance bonuses, as long as it is only a one-year contract. – J.J.)

Share this post:
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • MySpace
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Yahoo! Bookmarks
  • Wikio
  • Digg
  • Technorati
  • del.icio.us
  • LinkedIn
  • Netvibes
  • email
Jul 262010
Mason Raymond

Photo credit: canucks.com

Count me among those pleasantly surprised to hear this morning that the Canucks and Mason Raymond agreed on a new two-year contract before their scheduled arbitration hearing. The contract pays Raymond $2.5 million this upcoming season and $2.6 million the season after that; the cap hit is $2.55 million.

As Jason Botchford noted in his piece, there were comparables on the low and high ends.

Consider that heading into Monday’s arbitration hearing, Raymond’s agent J.P. Barry was armed with two big-money comparables — Travis Zajac, whose cap hit is nearly $3.8 million a year and Ryane Clowe, who chews up $3.625 million of the San Jose Sharks’ cap.

(skip)

Two of the comparables the Canucks were set to work off of in the arbitration case were the Rangers Ryan Callahan, who makes $2.3 million a year and Washington’s Eric Fehr, who recently avoided his own arbitration hearing by signing a two year deal in which he gets $2.2 million a year.

While it’s true that going through arbitration carries some risk for both parties, I’m surprised, based on earlier arbitration awards, that Raymond didn’t go through with the process. For example, Clarke MacArthur’s 37 points and -16 earned somehow earned him a $2.4 million award. By settling on this contract, I don’t think there’s any doubt that Raymond left some money on the table.

By avoiding arbitration, the Canucks probably saved upwards of $500K in cap space. If Raymond continues to produce 25+ goals and 50+ points – and there’s no reason to think he won’t – the $2.55 million cap hit will prove to be a bargain. Plus, signing Raymond to a two-year extension and ensuring that he remains an RFA after this contract is just good asset management.

Slowly yet surely, GM Mike Gillis continues to lock up this team’s core. And at reasonable terms too.

Share this post:
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • MySpace
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Yahoo! Bookmarks
  • Wikio
  • Digg
  • Technorati
  • del.icio.us
  • LinkedIn
  • Netvibes
  • email
Sami Salo

Photo credit: Vancouver Sun

I’m at the point now where I’m no longer surprised by news of a Sami Salo injury. At times, I don’t know whether to feel bad for the guy or laugh at his obvious bad luck. But anyway, in case you’re interested, Sami apparently suffered another injury in Finland not too long ago. If you can’t read Finnish, the piece reports that he tore an achilles tendon while playing hockey as part of his summer training regimen. It also reports that Sami will be out at least 4 months.

Maybe it’s not quite time to throw out those Kevin Bieksa jerseys yet.

[update: 07/23/2010, 10:01 AM]

I’ve received a couple of questions on how Salo’s injury affects the Canucks’ cap situation.

Basically, Salo’s cap hit ($3.5 million/193 days = approximately $18K per day) will continue to count towards the Canucks’ cap ($59.4 million/193 days = approximately $307K per day). If the Canucks place him on LTIR, the Canucks can go over the cap by a similar amount. However, once Salo is healthy and returns to the lineup, they will have to adjust their roster and go back under the cap again.

Share this post:
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • MySpace
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Yahoo! Bookmarks
  • Wikio
  • Digg
  • Technorati
  • del.icio.us
  • LinkedIn
  • Netvibes
  • email
Jul 062010

From Canucks Sports and Entertainment:

Canucks Sports & Entertainment (Canucks) and General Motors of Canada Limited (General Motors) today announce a new sponsor partnership that will see General Motors focus its activities on in-arena activations to build stronger awareness for its new products and services. As part of this new partnership, the home of the Vancouver Canucks will no longer be known as General Motors Place.

The Canucks have scheduled a news conference at 2 PM to announce the new name.

More to follow.

Share this post:
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • MySpace
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Yahoo! Bookmarks
  • Wikio
  • Digg
  • Technorati
  • del.icio.us
  • LinkedIn
  • Netvibes
  • email
Shane O'Brien beats up Derek Dorsett

Shane O’Brien has accepted his $1.6 million qualifying offer. Pending a trade, the Canucks now have 9 signed, NHL defensemen.

Going to arbitration was never an option for SOB:

“They probably have got a lot of material they can use against me and it probably wouldn’t work too well,” O’Brien joked with reporters. “If a one-year deal is all I’m going to get, I’ll come in and play hard.”

We’ll see.

When he has his head on straight, SOB has actually proven to be a solid bottom-pairing defenseman. When the Canucks defense corps got decimated by injuries last season, he played well enough despite logging more minutes than was expected of him. He gave the Canucks a physical presence they needed while cutting back on the stupid penalties from the season before. Off all regular Canucks defensemen, he finished tied with Christian Ehrhoff for the lowest GA/60 minutes.

Give or take a Rick Bowness run-in, he performed admirably good in the postseason, especially when he was forced to take on a top-4 role. He finished the playoffs with the second-best 5-on-5 Corsi rating among Canucks defensemen (only Alex Edler’s was better), and say what you will about the Canucks’ lousy PK in the playoffs, but SOB’s Corsi rating on the PK was best on the team.

Assuming a Bieksa trade, he’ll start the season at no. 6 on the Canucks’ depth chart; but with the inevitable injuries, he’ll likely get opportunities to he move further up the ladder. As Mike Gillis already stated after the season, it’ll be up to SOB to seize them.

“Shane is at that point in his career [when he must decide] whether he wants to do what’s necessary to become a top-five defenceman,” said Gillis.

For SOB, the challenge doesn’t get much clearer than that.

(Note: Stats as per Behind The Net.)

Share this post:
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • MySpace
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Yahoo! Bookmarks
  • Wikio
  • Digg
  • Technorati
  • del.icio.us
  • LinkedIn
  • Netvibes
  • email

In case you missed it, the Vancouver Canucks Prospects Development Camp starts today at GM Place. The 36-player roster includes:

DEFENCEMEN

Peter Andersson, Kevin Connauton, Maury Edwards (University of Massachusetts Lowell)*, Taylor Ellington, Brendan Ellis (Westside Warriors, BCHL)*, Taylor Fedun (Princeton)*, Sawyer Hannay, Patrick McNally, Kevan Miller (University of Vermont), Adam Polasek, Jeremy Price, Yann Sauve, Chris Tanev

FORWARDS

Steven Anthony, Kevin Clark (University of Alaska-Anchorage)*, Jack Downing (University of Vermont)*, Matt Fraser (Kootenay Ice, WHL)*, Alex Friesen, Mats Froshaug, James Henry (Vancouver Giants, WHL)*, Tayler Jordan (Portland Winterhawks, WHL)*, Taylor Matson, Pierre-Olivier Morin (Lewiston MAINEiacs, QMJHL)*, Prab Rai, Anton Rodin, Stefan Schneider, Jordan Schroeder, Kellan Tochkin, Aaron Volpatti, Scott Zurevinski (Quinnipiac University)*

GOALTENDERS

Joe Cannata, Michael Houser (London Knights, OHL)*, Jonathan Iilahti, Keith Kinkaid (Union College)*, Eddie Lack

(* – Players that have not been drafted or signed by the Vancouver Canucks)

Share this post:
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • MySpace
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Yahoo! Bookmarks
  • Wikio
  • Digg
  • Technorati
  • del.icio.us
  • LinkedIn
  • Netvibes
  • email
Mason Raymond, Jannik Hansen, Kevin Bieksa, Alex Edler, Vancouver Canucks

Three Canucks – Mason Raymond, Jannik Hansen and Tanner Glass – filed for salary arbitration before today’s 12:00 noon deadline.

I mentioned a couple of weeks ago that I wasn’t surprised that Raymond went the arbitration route. He had a breakout season in 2009/2010 and going this route effectively guarantees he remains a Canuck (unless of course he receives an extraordinarily high award the Canucks may be forced to walk away from). Teams can’t offer him and offer sheet, and by most reports, it sounds like Raymond and the Canucks may agree on a contract prior to the arbitration hearing anyway. But if they do proceed with arbitration, the maximum two-year term of the award ensures that Raymond remains a restricted free agent even after this contract. (Because Raymond elected for arbitration, it would be up to the Canucks to request a one-year or two-year award.)

I’m not as clear on Hansen’s and Glass’ motivation to file. They can certainly ask for much more than their qualifying offers ($605,000 and $550,000, respectively), but considering their stats last season – and arbitration is a stats-driven process – I’m not sure which comparables they’d present to argue a higher salary. Or maybe their motivation is to receive a one-way contract; that may be the case for Hansen, but Glass’ qualifying offer should be a one-way contract already anyway as he played in more than 60 games last season.

The arbitration hearings are scheduled from July 20th to August 5th.

Share this post:
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • MySpace
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Yahoo! Bookmarks
  • Wikio
  • Digg
  • Technorati
  • del.icio.us
  • LinkedIn
  • Netvibes
  • email
Jul 062010

Lost in all the hype of signing free agents Joel Perrault, Manny Malhotra, Jeff Tambellini, and Dan Hamhuis is the recent rumour which has Vancouver Canucks fans nearly wetting themselves.

With the Canucks blueline looking deeper than the grave Darryl Sutter has dug for the Calgary Flames, many fans would love nothing more than to see much-maligned defenceman Kevin Bieksa traded for whatever they can get.

But the return Canucks fans didn’t expect to hear in the rumour mill was an elite-level prospect.

Aaron Portzline of the Columbus Dispatch hinted on July 1st that the Columbus Blue Jackets are targeting a puckmoving defenceman with offensive capabilities and have Vancouver defenceman Kevin Bieksa in their crosshairs. This is what he had to say:

The Dispatch has confirmed late Thursday that Blue Jackets GM Scott Howson and Canucks GM Mike Gillis have had preliminary discussions about a trade that would send one of Vancouver’s mobile defensemen to Columbus.

The Canucks now have a slew of defensemen after acquiring defenseman Keith Ballard in a trade at the NHL entry draft and after signing free agent Dan Hamhuis to a long-term contract on Thursday.

The most likely to move is Bieksa, a 29-year old with a right shot who is a 10-12 goal, 35-40 point player when he’s healthy. Bieksa attended Bowling Green State University from 2000-01 to 2003-04, and has been an NHL fixture with the Canucks the last four seasons. His contract also doesn’t include a no-trade clause.

He would know Blue Jackets coach Scott Arniel from training camps in Vancouver and the odd injury rehab in Manitoba, the Canucks top minor league affiliate. But Bieksa’s name has surfaced many times in Columbus the last several seasons.

No deal is imminent, and it remains to be seen what the Blue Jackets would send toward Vancouver to swing the deal. But left winger Nikita Filatov is a definite possibility, sources told The Dispatch.

Filatov, a 20-year-old winger who has twice played for Russia in the World Junior Championships (13 games played, 9 goals and 8 assists) was drafted by the Columbus Blue Jackets in 2008 at sixth overall, four spots ahead of the current top Canucks prospect Cody Hodgson, who went tenth overall. Since his draft, Filatov has spent time with the Blue Jackets (6 goals, including a hat trick, in 21 games), the Syracuse Crunch (16 goals, 32 points) as well as his CSKA Moscow squad last year after being loaned from Columbus.

Unfortunately for Filatov, the start of his NHL career didn’t go as smoothly as hoped. Under the coaching guidance from Ken Hitchcock, a noted tough guy when it comes to giving rookies playing time, Filatov wasn’t utilized to his full potential, getting anywhere from five to eight minutes a game last season. Fed up with his lack of playing time, Filatov was promptly loaned to his CSKA team for the remainder of the 2009-10 season. Hitchcock was fired three months later.

The decision to send Filatov packing to the KHL drew the ire of many Columbus fans, who feared what happened to former top Russian prospect Nikolai Zherdev would happen to Filatov.

Perhaps then, it may seem understandable as to why Filatov could be on the block.

But Filatov has insisted on a number of occasions he wants nothing more than to play in North America, specifically in the NHL. He promised to return in August with the intention of trying to earn a roster spot with the Columbus Blue Jackets, which separates himself from the Zherdev fiasco.

Not only that, but Filatov is only a year removed from being named The Hockey News‘ #1-ranked prospect (ahead of Hodgson, who went #2). As a Russian sniper with speed, excellent vision, and finish, Filatov isn’t quite cut from the same mold as an Alex Ovechkin or Ilya Kovalchuk, but he’s not far behind. With the appropriate amount of playing time and chances, Filatov will be a superstar in the NHL. It’s just a matter of where and when.

From the Blue Jackets’ standpoint, yes, the team could certainly use an offensively-skilled defenceman. But given the type of talent available by trade (Tomas Kaberle) or for free (Sheldon Souray), even the biggest of Canucks fans would take those type of players over Kevin Bieksa, and twice on Sundays. Bieksa is the kind of defenceman who can be relied upon to contribute solid minutes as a second-pairing blueliner, but by no means is a franchise player, and certainly not one who should be traded for an elite Russian prospect, however much of a headcase he may or may not be.

As a Canucks fan, I would love to see this trade happen. The problem is I just don’t want to get my hopes up. This is the kind of trade that only happens in the wildest of fantasies. The trade value of the two players is not even close.

This is just the tip of the iceberg. I’m sure in the coming days we’ll learn more about this trade possibility, but in the meantime, it’s nice to dream.

Share this post:
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • MySpace
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Yahoo! Bookmarks
  • Wikio
  • Digg
  • Technorati
  • del.icio.us
  • LinkedIn
  • Netvibes
  • email
© 2010 CANUCKS HOCKEY BLOG Suffusion WordPress theme by Sayontan Sinha