Apr 232009
 

Before I go praising the Canucks through every high hill and low dale, I have to give credit where credit is due and that’s to the St. Louis Blues. They played a fantastic series, they were young, inexperienced, and they gave us a heck of a run for our money. The 4-0 series sweep was no indication of how close the series was and even in the last game, they were down, they got up, they tied it, and they took us late into OT before they finally fell to their final playoff loss of the Western Conference Quarterfinals.

So now the Canucks have up to 10 days off. Should I be worried? Should we start throwing up the red flags? The Canucks of old would certainly have raised question in our minds as to whether they’d benefit from such a long break. Then again, that was the Canucks squad that came out flat against most opponents many nights, that was the Canucks squad that had no secondary scoring, and that was a Canucks squad that’s specialty teams were absolutely brutal. Here’s a Canucks team that defies everything we know and love about this team as fans. They’ve shown us a level of play we never thought was possible from them, and now have me thinking that even after 10 days off they’ll be just fine.

The boys need to use the time wisely and just heal their wounds. The early round advancing was a blessing in disguise. Salo and Sundin who were healthy scratches in game 4 now have a little extra time to fix their respective injuries. Demitra could use the time, as could Luongo and Henrik Sedin who were both a little shaken up at different times in the OT series clincher. I’m sure even Ryan Johnson could use a break and take care of the bruises he’s inevitably amounted after going down for nearly every shot he can.

No matter who we face in the second round I think the break will benefit us. If we face Detroit because San Jose pulls off the comeback in their series, then we’ll face a team that’s equally rested (barring a miracle on ice by the Blue Jackets). If that’s the case then they’ll likely be a little off their game from the lack of game time too. If we play the winner of the Chicago/Calgary series, I get the feeling the winner is going to emerge after 7 games, and with that in mind, they’re going to come out tired, and beat up. So even if we’re off our game a little after the long break, the fact we’ve got rested legs should make up for the temporary out of sync play that should start to dissipate through the first period.

This is a Canucks team that we haven’t ever seen. This is the best team we’ve seen since the West Coast express saw Naslund and Bert finish 2 and 3 in the scoring race during the regular season. While we all could try and predict what might happen, we’re likely shooting in the dark because none of us would have predicted this the way it turned out.

  • Brian O’Neill

    This team is better than any team we’ve had in the past, the team we had in 2001/02 when Nazzy and Bert were 2nd and 3rd seems more reminiscent of this years blues team.

  • http://www.hockeytweets.thehockeyzen.com Chris Nadeau

    I think the Canucks are going to do some damage this year. They have all the qualities of a Cup winner. Depth, very good D and of course an amazing goalie.

    Good luck and keep tweeting

    Chris
    @cnadeau

  • Brian O’Neill

    This team is better than any team we’ve had in the past, the team we had in 2001/02 when Nazzy and Bert were 2nd and 3rd seems more reminiscent of this years blues team.

  • http://www.hockeytweets.thehockeyzen.com Chris Nadeau

    I think the Canucks are going to do some damage this year. They have all the qualities of a Cup winner. Depth, very good D and of course an amazing goalie.

    Good luck and keep tweeting

    Chris
    @cnadeau

  • John

    The team we had in 2001/02 was great, but doesn’t hold a candle to this team today. You could say the offensive capabilities is comparable, but Cloutier vs Luongo? The defense was pretty suspect while this one is solid from position 1 through 6.

    I’m still a little hesitant to predict any further rounds though, especially with the Wings absolutely dismantling the Jackets (yes, it’s the Jackets, but it’s still impressive), but we still have a lot to be optimistic about with this team.

  • John

    The team we had in 2001/02 was great, but doesn’t hold a candle to this team today. You could say the offensive capabilities is comparable, but Cloutier vs Luongo? The defense was pretty suspect while this one is solid from position 1 through 6.

    I’m still a little hesitant to predict any further rounds though, especially with the Wings absolutely dismantling the Jackets (yes, it’s the Jackets, but it’s still impressive), but we still have a lot to be optimistic about with this team.

%d bloggers like this: