Spring Break for the Canucks

You may also like...

6 Responses

  1. Brian O'Neill says:

    This team is better than any team we’ve had in the past, the team we had in 2001/02 when Nazzy and Bert were 2nd and 3rd seems more reminiscent of this years blues team.

  2. Chris Nadeau says:

    I think the Canucks are going to do some damage this year. They have all the qualities of a Cup winner. Depth, very good D and of course an amazing goalie.

    Good luck and keep tweeting

    Chris
    @cnadeau

  3. Brian O'Neill says:

    This team is better than any team we’ve had in the past, the team we had in 2001/02 when Nazzy and Bert were 2nd and 3rd seems more reminiscent of this years blues team.

  4. Chris Nadeau says:

    I think the Canucks are going to do some damage this year. They have all the qualities of a Cup winner. Depth, very good D and of course an amazing goalie.

    Good luck and keep tweeting

    Chris
    @cnadeau

  5. John says:

    The team we had in 2001/02 was great, but doesn’t hold a candle to this team today. You could say the offensive capabilities is comparable, but Cloutier vs Luongo? The defense was pretty suspect while this one is solid from position 1 through 6.

    I’m still a little hesitant to predict any further rounds though, especially with the Wings absolutely dismantling the Jackets (yes, it’s the Jackets, but it’s still impressive), but we still have a lot to be optimistic about with this team.

  6. John says:

    The team we had in 2001/02 was great, but doesn’t hold a candle to this team today. You could say the offensive capabilities is comparable, but Cloutier vs Luongo? The defense was pretty suspect while this one is solid from position 1 through 6.

    I’m still a little hesitant to predict any further rounds though, especially with the Wings absolutely dismantling the Jackets (yes, it’s the Jackets, but it’s still impressive), but we still have a lot to be optimistic about with this team.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>