Throat Slashers and Arm Chair GMs

It seems everyone and their dog has an opinion on what to do with Luongo. Most recently the goalie graveyard theory has resurfaced and now everyone and his dog has a package deal in their head in which they want to get rid of Luongo now while he has value (in the order of one year left on his contract) and get something good for him.

Ed Willes provides an interesting take on trading Luongo. But his oversimplification and general bandwagon stench makes it clear that he and Iain MacIntyre get together and sulk in a corner on weekends.

I may have gone off on Luongo in my post after the last game of our season, but I still stand by him. He’s done more in his 3 seasons with the Canucks that other Canucks goalies have taken their entire careers to do. I don’t think he’s done yet. He’s had two playoff appearances as a Canuck in 3 seasons. In the first playoff appearance he can’t be faulted. He single handedly won us the first round, and the team is completely at fault for not supporting his play. This year in his second playoffs he can be held a little more accountable for his actions. I certainly hold him responsible for what happened in game 6.

BUT I don’t think it’s time to throw in the towel with Luongo. How many seasons did we give Cloutier? We gave Cloutier 5. The only thing Cloutier has done that Luongo hasn’t is play more games in a single playoffs.

Luongo has a lot to prove in this next season. Especially after what he said about signing on with a contender after his contract is up. I know by not trading him we run the risk of losing out on his worth through a trade, but we also run the risk of him turning up his game during the playoffs and making a deep run. Everyone knows what a contract year does to players. Look what it did to Khabibulin in Tampa Bay and now again in Chicago?

While the Bandwagon castrated and hung Luongo out to dry, I’d like to say that what I wrote about him does not mean I’m ready to slash his throat. I’m not part of the bandwagon that are patrolling Robson with pitchforks and torches ready to burn and pillage anything Luongo they can find. He will stay in Vancouver, and he will resign next year if not sooner. Gillis likes to make statements of reaffirmation in his players. It wouldnt surprise me if even in the offseason Luongo signed a contract extension.

You may also like...

7 Responses

  1. MOSSey3535 says:

    Since 1992: Roy Richter Brodeur Roy Vernon Osgood Belfour Brodeur Roy Hasek Brodeur Khabibuln Ward Giguere Osgood. You need a star goalie. If you don’t have a star goaltender, the first Cup win often makes them into a star goaltender (a la Roy and Dryden).

    The Canucks DO NOT have a lot of holes in their lineup. In fact, I think during this post season they proved they have (almost) have four effective lines.

    What they lack is a player with the ability to take over a game in the playoffs. Willis is looking in the wrong place. Instead of looking at the goaltenders, he should be looking at Crosby vs Ovechkin; Staal vs Savard; Getzlaf/Perry vs Franzen/Datsyuk. The Canucks don’t have a dominant, game-changing forward. Who do we have that is as skilled as Toews, Sharp or Kane? At his age, I don’t think Sundin counts.

  2. MOSSey3535 says:

    Since 1992: Roy Richter Brodeur Roy Vernon Osgood Belfour Brodeur Roy Hasek Brodeur Khabibuln Ward Giguere Osgood. You need a star goalie. If you don’t have a star goaltender, the first Cup win often makes them into a star goaltender (a la Roy and Dryden).

    The Canucks DO NOT have a lot of holes in their lineup. In fact, I think during this post season they proved they have (almost) have four effective lines.

    What they lack is a player with the ability to take over a game in the playoffs. Willis is looking in the wrong place. Instead of looking at the goaltenders, he should be looking at Crosby vs Ovechkin; Staal vs Savard; Getzlaf/Perry vs Franzen/Datsyuk. The Canucks don’t have a dominant, game-changing forward. Who do we have that is as skilled as Toews, Sharp or Kane? At his age, I don’t think Sundin counts.

  3. cubrikaska says:

    Que insolencia!

  4. cubrikaska says:

    Que insolencia!

  1. May 31, 2009

    […] CANUCKS HOCKEY BLOG Throat Slashers and Arm Chair GMs Posted by root 25 minutes ago (http://canuckshockeyblog.com) One comment for throat slashers and arm chair gms since 1992 roy richter brodeur roy powered by wordpress middot theme by the masterplan Discuss  |  Bury |  News | CANUCKS HOCKEY BLOG Throat Slashers and Arm Chair GMs […]

  2. June 13, 2009

    […] CANUCKS HOCKEY BLOG Throat Slashers and Arm Chair GMs Posted by root 10 minutes ago (http://canuckshockeyblog.com) By richard loat may 13 2009 post a comment throat slashers and arm chair gms since 1992 roy richter brodeur roy powered by wordpress middot theme Discuss  |  Bury |  News | CANUCKS HOCKEY BLOG Throat Slashers and Arm Chair GMs […]

  3. June 14, 2009

    […] CANUCKS HOCKEY BLOG Throat Slashers and Arm Chair GMs Posted by root 9 minutes ago (http://canuckshockeyblog.com) Throat slashers and arm chair gms by richard loat may 13 2009 post a comment throat slashers and arm chair gms since 1992 roy richter brodeur roy powered by wordpress post a comment name e mail web site comment Discuss  |  Bury |  News | CANUCKS HOCKEY BLOG Throat Slashers and Arm Chair GMs […]

%d bloggers like this: