Apr 212011
 

After every Canucks playoff game, we’ll break down one key play, frame-by-frame.

The Situation

The score is knotted at 1-1 early in the second period. Vancouver has just killed off a Chicago powerplay and dumped the puck behind Crawford’s net. CBC’s commentators mention how quiet the crowd is.

Frame 1 (5:12)

Kesler briefly waves his stick at Campbell before heading to the bench. Notice the horrible timing of this line change.

Frame 2 (5:13)

Campbell passes the puck to Kane as the Sedins jump over the boards, already behind the play.

Frame 3 (5:14)

Kane skates over the blueline as linesmen miss Samuelsson pushing Toews offside. (NHL series supervisor Rob Shick admitted after the game, “Yes, it was offside but they did score five more.”)

Frame 4 (5:15)

Because the Sedins are stuck up ice, this is a 4-on-3 for Chicago. Samuelsson takes Toews as Ehrhoff and Edler defend.

Frame 5 (5:15)

But wait! Even though Edler and Ehrhoff are covering Kane, Samuelsson decides they need some help. He abandons Toews and Campbell and lunges towards Kane.

Frame 6 (5:16)

This gives Kane two great options: feed the puck to Toews as he heads to the net, or throw it to Campbell at the top of the circle as everyone falls back.

Frame 7 (5:16)

Kane gives the puck to Campbell. Toews, Ehrhoff, Edler, Kane, Samuelsson and Sharp form a celebratory conga line for Campbell’s shot. Notice Luongo is already down.

Frame 8 (5:17)

Daniel and Henrik glide into the zone. “Hey everyone, did we miss anything?”

Apr 202011
 

After every Canucks playoff game, we’ll break down one key play, frame-by-frame.

(Editor’s note: Sorry folks. I know we’re a bit behind here.)

The Situation

After being under siege for the first half of the game, Vancouver strikes 7 seconds into its first powerplay on a Christian Ehrhoff marker. Immediately after, Chris Higgins hits the post, the puck comes out of Chicago’s zone, and Edler carries it back in as the Sedins come over the boards.

Frame 1 (10:51)

In the middle of a line change, Edler takes Bieksa’s cross-ice pass on his backhand.

Frame 2 (10:52)

Edler goes down the wing as rookie defenceman Nick Leddy (who turned 20 a couple weeks ago) approaches. Expecting Edler to pass laterally, Leddy blocks the blue line with his stick.

Frame 3 (10:53)

Because Leddy approaches at a bad angle, Edler easily gains outside position in him. Leddy’s out of the play by now.

Frame 4 (10:54)

Suddenly a low-percentage 2-on-3 has turned into a good scoring chance for Edler. The Swede pulls his stick back, eyeing Crawford for the wrist shot.

Frame 5 (10:55)

Crawford comes out to challenge. Leddy, Keith and Frolik are all focused on Edler. No one’s picked up Daniel Sedin sneaking into the slot.

Frame 6 (10:55)

One person’s noticed Sedin: Edler. In one smooth motion he swings the puck over to Sedin. Expecting a shot, Crawford goes down.

Frame 7 (10:56)

Daniel fans on the pass. Luckily for him, Keith also fans on the clearing attempt, as the puck narrowly misses the heel of his stick.

Frame 8 (10:56)

Crawford is completely out of the play, having gone down early and now tangled up with Leddy. Daniel connects on his second whack, and out of nowhere Vancouver is up 2-1.

Apr 152011
 

Where the heck did that come from on Wednesday?

In the previous week, we’ve heard all kinds of experts confirm the Canucks as the favorite to win it all this June but an equal number of them expressed that they wouldn’t be surprised if the most dominant team in the NHL this regular season with all their trophies and top-5 presence in nearly every important statistical category were bounced by the reigning champs in the first round. Why? Most questioned whether the Canucks were tough enough both mentally and physically to make it through what is probably the most difficult post season in sports. We were too soft, too fancy, too Swedish to play with the big boys. Our style was too regular season. Our grit and grime was enough for November but not April.

One game isn’t enough of a sample size to make a realistic call on whether the Canucks are tough enough. But 47-21 is a big advantage in hits, and while they’re banged up, the Blackhawks aren’t small. However, they have lost a lot of the physical presence that made them so hard to play against last year. Gone is Dustin Byfuglien’s 265-pound presence in front of Luongo. Actually, the ‘Hawks have another giant on their roster by the name of John Scott but that guy hasn’t played since March and his 4 career points aren’t likely to phase Luongo. His hands are probably made of stone and/or ham since he’s more used to using them as facial softness testers on opposing teams rather than putting pucks in the net.

The ‘Hawks are also without Dave Bolland who’s still out with a concussion but that doesn’t quite explain how the Canucks exploded into the playoffs with a new physical game. If you look at their stats all season, they’re closer to the bottom of the league in terms of hits, blocked shots and for the first time in recent memory, not one player was over 100 PIMs (there were 5 last year and 4 before that). Jannik Hansen who leads the team in hits is less than halfway to NHL hits (and name awesomeness) leader Cal Clutterbuck. Personally, I had a few fears as well of the Canucks being able to play playoff hockey, where the refs make fewer calls.

But now I’m thinking the Canucks were just saving it all year, hoping to manage injuries knowing full well in October that they were going to make the playoffs. I know that sounds ridiculous. I thought so too but the more I think about it, the more it makes sense.

How else can you explain that Sami Salo, the most injury prone player on the roster since he arrived in Vancouver, threw three hits on Wednesday, taking away time and space from players that were learning their ABCs when he started in the NHL. Consider that three hits is 50% of his hits total for the entire regular season. He’s had 49 hits in his 692 career games and I’m almost sure the majority of those were by accident. Heck, when’s the last time you thought of Sami Salo and physical game at the same time without Salo being injured at the end of it? I would’ve sooner believed he could be injured just thinking about throwing a hit but his crunch on ‘Hawks Tomas Kopecky and Viktor Stalberg last night proved otherwise.

You also have to consider Alex Edler, just a couple games back from missing over 30 after back surgery laying out monster checks everywhere, especially on ‘Hawks captain Jonathan Toews, finishing with seven total, one behind Maxim Lapierre for the team lead. Michael Frolik had six to lead the Blackhawks but he must’ve been doing that off camera because I don’t remember that guy playing 18 minutes. In short, the Canucks dominated the physical game. Maybe they were tired of being pushed around by the ‘Hawks the last two seasons and decided they weren’t going to take that crap anymore.

Whether the Canucks can build on this one-to-nil series lead is up in the air as there’s still lots of hockey to be played and we can never underestimate the Blackhawks after falling to them each of the last two years in the post season. However, if the Canucks maintain everything they’ve done all year and add the physical game we saw last night, there should be little reason to worry. Why?

  1. Depth is reversed. The Canucks are a much deeper team than the Blackhawks this year. We have nine or ten NHL playoff capable defensemen available and nearly all healthy. Our most important forwards are all healthy and while our bottom six isn’t as strong as I would like, they’re contributing at the right time and playing tight. Dan Hamhuis led all Canucks in ice time last night while five Blackhawks played more than his 22 and change. If the Canucks continue to play hard, the Blackhawks will have to rely even more on their top players. They’re world class athletes but fatigue has to set in when your forwards are playing over 23 minutes a game.
  2. Almost more important than the Canucks physical presence is the ‘Hawks lackthereof. Luongo has been sharp and without a big body in front of him, he’s even better. The Canucks are middle of the pack when it comes to shots allowed but near the bottom in blocked shots. I’m guessing this is by design with Rollie Melanson’s philosophy this year. Block what you can but otherwise, get the hell out of the way and let Louie see it. Luongo has been stronger positionally this year than he has probably his entire career. If he can see it, he’ll likely stop it and with the Canucks depth on defense, there probably won’t be much parked in front of Lu this series.
  3. Special teams. While they weren’t much of a factor in scoring on Wednesday, the Canucks have the advantage in case things get ugly. The ‘Hawks have to be worried that countering with their own physical game could result in getting burned when the Canucks get the man advantage. Yes, the Blackhawks are probably just as good on the powerplay but our penalty kill is decidedly better. Alex Burrows and Ryan Kesler almost connected on a short-handed chance despite being hounded by three Chicago players.

But again, it’s one game and it’s the Blackhawks. We were all optimistic last year after the first game and I don’t know about you but by the time game six came around, I was ready to jump out a window. There’s a lot to work on for the ‘Nucks. Their second period was sloppy at best and they just barely contained the four star, although overworked, Blackhawks forwards in Toews, Marian Hossa, Patrick Sharp and that mullet-wearing kid.

However, what they did show us was they can do even better than their magical regular season, that they can add another dimension to their already stellar game come playoff time and as a Canucks fan, I can’t help but be even more excited than before.

Feb 282011
 

[Every Monday, Katie Maximick takes your questions and gives her take on the Canucks in her own cantankerous style. If you have any questions about the Canucks, send it to her via Twitter (@KMaximick)]

Keith Ballard, Vancouver Canucks

Photo credit: canucks.nhl.com

Happy Monday, Canucks fans.

There were some ups and downs this weekend in the world of the Canucks. The Bruins took down the Canucks on Saturday night. And then on Sunday the team delighted thousands of fans at Rogers Arena during the Superskills competition. Sunday’s antics couldn’t erase Saturday’s loss, however, and many fans are still talking about the Bruins’ size being a factor in their win.

Dave (@merlynbc) asks: Are the Canucks big enough and/or strong enough to withstand the bashing and crashing of a long playoff run?

Katie: After Saturday’s game against a much bigger Boston team, a lot of fans have been wondering the same thing. The Canucks aren’t as big as some of their past rosters have been, but this is Alain Vigneault’s vision of a Cup-winning team; it’s not about size and fighting, it’s about depth and winning. There was a lot of backlash when Getzlaf’s hit on Hamhuis wasn’t retaliated by any of the Canucks; just eight years ago that would never have been the case.

Personally I would like to see a bigger, tougher team because that’s how I like my hockey: rough and tumble, but this doesn’t mean the team doesn’t have what it takes to go deep into the playoffs. With the depth of the roster (and the help of Ballard’s delightful hipchecks) the team has just the right amount of (dare I say it) grit and talent to go deep.

Injuries, however, are a hindrance we can’t predict or avoid. Obviously they’re a different story altogether.

Matt (@m_maclean24) asks: How about your thoughts on the Canucks’ chances at the President’s Trophy, or whether or not that even means anything…

Katie: I think they have a pretty good shot at it; their best in years for sure. Some fans don’t think the Canucks should try that hard, suggesting that top place in the league, or even the Division, isn’t as much of a priority as having a healthy, rested team.

It would be awesome to get the President’s Trohpy for obvious reasons (like bragging rights) but I think Vancouver has its eyes on the bigger prize – the Stanley Cup. What’s a President’s Trophy if you can’t back up a top-notch season with a Cup?

Jason (@jasonwheelerBC) asks: Would trading the slumping Raymond upset the team chemistry too much heading into the playoffs?

Katie: I guess that would depend on who they’d bring in to replace him. From watching the Superskills on Sunday, Raymond is still a big favourite among his teammates and fans alike. If it didn’t upset the chemistry, it might upset the team. But then, there’s no crying in baseball. I mean hockey. From what Gillis said recently, I don’t think Raymond will be traded by the trade deadline, but I suppose we’ll find out soon enough.

Michael (@mfoxrocks) asks: Keeping with the theme of the [Oscars], which Canuck would be most likely to win an award for theatrical talent?

Katie: Alex Edler, for this.

Hope you enjoyed today’s column. Have a good week, everyone!

Feb 232011
 

After an unfortunate rash of injuries, the Canucks got Dan Hamhuis and Keith Ballard back last night against the Montreal Canadiens. This resulted in one of their worst starts this season as the period of re-adjustment cost them two goals and ultimately the game. With their return though, came no drastic impact. Ballard and Hamhuis are core blue liners with skill sets far superior to their replacements Oberg and Sauve, but their impact is defensive and more subtle.

When you look at the remaining injured blueliners, Kevin Bieksa and Alex Edler are two of the more prominent blueliners on this team. Bieksa brings and edge to this team which would have surely fought PK Subban. Bieksa isn’t the one I’m worried about though. We’ve managed without him before, we’ve won without him before. As we look at the return dates for our players on the IR, the date on my calendar that’s circled in red is the return of Alex Edler.

As we shift towards and start to gear up for the playoffs – the season that really counts – the injury that’s worrying me the most is Edler’s. The back surgery he underwent has an unpredictable nature with respect to a rehab and return time, but the hope is still there that he’s in the lineup in time for the playoffs.

If you remember back to last season he was the one player that showed up on day one and fought through to the last game. He’s a big game player that elevates his play and leads by example. The impact he’s had on Ehrhoff’s offensive game has also been noticeable, and recently, noticeably lacking. In a West Coast postseason that’s oriented around wearing down the opponent in a three-round battle of physical attrition, Edler’s presence doubles as he’s not only contributing offensively but is a monster physically.

Edler is the key to the entire Canucks defense corps. Since his injury, we’ve seen a drastic decline in play from Christian Ehrhoff, who has struggled of late both in discipline and in offense. His defensive game has taken a hit and that’s in large part due to the absence of Edler. In Salo’s return to the lineup we’ve seen him transition well at a time when the Canucks lost six blueliners in three weeks, but it’s clear he has many more layers of rust to shake off. The point shot he was once known for doesn’t come out to play as much as it used to and his protege, Edler, has developed his sense of calm for quarterbacking the powerplay. Edler’s shot and presence on the powerplay and at the blueline is one that anchors the Canucks defense as he tandems with Ehrhoff to power that first unit.

As for the rest of the defense, Hamhuis is a solid shut down guy and Bieksa has edge. Ballard’s adjusting to a new role on this team but has been defensively solid. Alberts has shown great improvements, and Rome is, well Rome. Tanev’s auditioning for next year’s roster spot, and Sweatt, Oberg and Sauve did just what they were asked to do.

I have no doubt that Edler will step up when the playoffs roll around. Hopefully, he’ll build on last season’s postseason success, come back from injury and lead this team. Hopefully, he continues to develop into quite a phenomenal young blueliner and be integral in the success of the Canucks’ blueline, the powerplay and many other facets of this team that he has impacted with his play.

Feb 072011
 

[Every Monday, Katie Maximick takes your questions and gives her take on the Canucks in her own cantankerous style. If you have any questions about the Canucks, send it to her via Twitter (@KMaximick)]

Hi there, hungover Canucks fans! For those of you who don’t give a damn about football, thanks for your questions for today’s column. You were a big help during a hectic weekend when people were too enthralled with Troy Polamalu’s mane of hair and Fergie’s train-wreck version of Sweet Child of Mine to help me out.

You, my friends, saved the day.

I feel like I’ve already answered the following question, but what the heck.

Jovan (@jovanheer) asks: Who should we trade for at the deadline?

I had this discussion during the Super Bowl around a poker table (not like I played, I’m useless when it comes to poker), and the conclusion we came to was – nobody. Unless we lose a defenseman right before the playoffs, there’s really no reason to go for or unload anyone by the 28th. As I’ve mentioned before, probably last week, we have a very deep roster and our secondary scoring is picking up again after a bit of a slump.  Raymond’s name is being tossed around as a favourite to go, similar to Bieksa’s story before he decided he wanted to perform well, but let’s face it, if he’s going to go anywhere, it probably won’t be until the off-season.

Then again, I’ve been surprised before.

BCAA Booster (@BCAAbooster) asks: Hodgson’s cage… what’s the deal?

As the Kurtenblog wrote, some may have noticed that Hodgson’s been “wearing a facial cage from the Hayley Wickenheiser collection”. This is because he cracked the orbital bone in his face during a Manitoba Moose practice on December 9th and missed 16 games as a result. The cage is basically to protect his face until he has the orders that he’s in the clear. It was a pretty serious injury and he can’t risk a stick to the face at the moment. Remind anyone of the Willie Mitchell look from the ’03 playoffs?

David (@merlynbc) asks (or actually suggests): The coincidence of injury/recovery with Canucks is interesting. Think #6/#23. Think #54′s foot. Not a conspiracy theorist but…

You’re not the first to point this out. I think even Jason Botchford and Tony Gallagher addressed the “conspiracy” on The Province’s live chat last week. Conspiracy theories are very popular among Canucks fans, or NHL fans in general. I wouldn’t go as far as to think that the Canucks could plan blueline injuries with such impeccable timing to make cap room for Salo. I would just think it was good (and lucky) timing for the team. Perhaps Salo was close to coming back anyway, and was taking things slow so as not to shatter any of his glass parts too soon; perhaps Edler’s injury forced Salo to make a decision and return quicker than he would have liked. We don’t know, and knowing the tight-lipped Canucks we probably won’t ever find out the exact details.

Jason (@@jasonwheelerBC) asks: How many starts do you see Schneider getting for the rest of the season?

So far Schneider’s played 13 games, and according to pre-season comments by Mike Gillis, Ginger Bricks would likely see 20-25 starts in order to give Luongo a long-awaited break. I may be really bad at math, but I’m going to go and estimate that he’ll see 7 to 12 more starts before the playoffs. Cheeky enough for you, Wheeler?

That’s all, folks.

And just to update you all, my introduction to football didn’t go well yesterday. I think I’ll stick to hockey.

Feb 042011
 

My apologies for not posting anything in the last couple of days. Work and home life got a bit crazy.

Regardless, allow me to share some quick thoughts on the Canucks this week.

*****

Is it just me or does the Canucks’ rise to the top of the NHL standings feel somewhat surreal?

Recently, it’s almost as if the Canucks can’t do anything wrong. Even during their worst stretch of the season early in January when they lost 6 of 8 games, they managed 8 points and maintained their first place standing in the Western Conference. Despite being decimated by injuries on the back end, they’ve put together a 4-game winning streak.

As a Canucks fan, I’ve learnt to expect the worst so it wasn’t a surprise when the number of injured defensemen rose to four. What has been a pleasant surprise is how this team hasn’t skipped a beat despite the injuries.

*****

It’s interesting to watch the succession plan – and depth – this team has on defense, especially in the last couple of weeks. When Aaron Rome was injured, Andrew Alberts stepped up. When Alberts went down, Chris Tanev stepped in. With Alex Edler was lost for the remainder of the regular season, Keith Ballard stepped seamlessly into the top-4 and Lee Sweatt, in his first taste of NHL action, scored his 1st NHL goal and has 2 points in 3 games.

Oh, and that Sami Salo guy is close to coming back.

And Edler may very well be back in the playoffs.

*****

I can’t imagine anyone with a more vested interested in Cody Hodgson’s play than GM Mike Gillis. After a tough past couple of seasons, there’s no doubt everyone in Canucks Nation – from Canucks management to the coaching staff to the players to the fans – wants him to succeed. But for GMMG, Cody represents more than a highly-touted prospect. He represents the first Canucks draft pick in the Mike Gillis era to play an NHL game.

When GMMG first came on-board, he made it clear that he wanted to build up the Canucks’ scouting and development team. True to his word, the Canucks now have one of the largest scouting and development budgets in the league.

But for everything GMMG has done and the Canucks have accomplished this season, a lot of his critics still point to the fact that the various core players of this team were drafted by its previous GMs. (Never mind the fact that these same core players only just matured under Gillis’ watch, but I digress.)

One of the stories from Cody’s draft year is how Mike Gillis, on Dave Gagner’s recommendation, overrode the Canucks scouting staff’s recommendation to draft Kyle Beach and select Cody instead. Despite Cody making the NHL before Beach, it’s obviously too early for us to judge this move. But if his first 2 games are any indication, he’s going to be just fine.

And deep down inside, I’m sure GMMG is smiling just a little bit.

*****

One more thing about the prospects.

Every team preaches the mantra that it’s important to build through the draft. In order to be successful in the salary cap world, every team needs players on entry-level contracts or low cap hits to outperform their contracts.

The problem is, the 2006 and 2007 drafts have yielded no quality prospects for the Canucks, except for Michael Grabner, who is now on Long Island, and Sergei Shirokov. And to be honest, I still have doubts about Shirokov being a full-time NHL regular. Meanwhile, the 2008, 2009 and 2010 draft picks are probably (or hopefully) a couple of years away from putting in any meaningful contributions.

Despite that, you have to admit that the Canucks have done a good job of bridging the gap. On Tuesday, they had five rookies in the lineup – Cory Schneider, Aaron Volpatti, Chris Tanev, Lee Sweatt and Hodgson. Schneider, of course, was a Dave Nonis draft pick, but Volpatti, Tanev and Sweatt were all free agent signings by Mike Gillis. Add his relative success in his other free agent signings (i.e. Jeff Tambellini, Tanner Glass, etc.) and the Canucks have been able to plug holes in the lineup and give the rest of the prospects time to develop in Manitoba.

Jan 312011
 

[Every Monday, Katie Maximick takes your questions and gives her take on the Canucks in her own cantankerous style. If you have any questions about the Canucks, send it to her via Twitter (@KMaximick)]

Lee Sweatt

Photo credit: canucks.nhl.com

If the theme of last week’s Ask Katie About the Canucks was the shootout and Vancouver’s recent slump, this week’s theme is about trades as the Canucks suffer from an injury-plagued blueline and the NHL’s February 28th trade deadline looms around the corner. But rather than speculate a lot (because frankly that’s all we can do when it comes to trade rumours), I’ll answer one and move on to the others.

Tyler (@ChiefsFanTy) asks: Should we trade for Gonchar or another d man for the Cup run?

Personally I don’t think we need to trade for a defenseman at all. We have enough; they’re just injured at the moment (Alberts, Rome, Salo, Edler). That being said we should be okay whenever they return, especially Salo and Edler, obviously the sooner the better. The blueline has a lot of depth and surprisingly I’m not worried (yet), mostly because I believe either Edler or Salo will be back in time, maybe even both if we’re lucky. It’s not time to hit the panic button because the team seems to be doing okay despite the injuries. What needs some work is secondary scoring. But that’s a different answer to an already asked question.

And speaking of Edler…

Chris (@Chris_Withers) asks: What powerplay configurations should the Canucks go with in Edler’s absence?

It’s most likely that Bieksa will be joining Ehrhoff on the top power-play unit for pretty obvious reasons. Bieksa has a right-handed shot and has had a great season so far. In my opinion he’s earned the spot over the others until either Edler or Salo return. Samuelsson played the point in the last game, and he could do so again if that’s what AV’s looking for. Also if Salo returns first obviously he’ll be on the top unit, but who knows when that will be. Ballard and Hamhuis clearly on the second unit, but Samuelsson could fit in there on the point as well. AV is unpredictable and could start juggling here. Some fans think Lee Sweatt (aka Rudy) should be given a shot on the second unit, but is that realistic or risky? What do you guys think?

Al (@theALmighty66) asks: What’s the name of the song played in Rogers Arena when VAN goes on the PP? I dig it!

I know one of them is a remix of Wolfmother’s “Joker and the Thief”, but can’t find the name (or footage) of the other one they play. You’ll have to ask DJ Dave for that one.

(@BEcanucks) asks: Could you try to explain why, according to the NHLPA survey, [NHL players] all want to play in Vancouver and think it’s overrated?

Because being “overrated” doesn’t take away from the team’s overall success or the liveability of the city they play in. Vancouver is considered overrated because it talks the talk during the regular season but doesn’t walk the walk in the playoffs. Unless the Canucks can get past the second round, they won’t be taken seriously by NHL players or fans of other clubs.

That being said, Vancouver’s a great city to play for in many ways. It has a fantastic, passionate fan base, the arena sells out every game, the city itself is one of the most beautiful in the world and the winters are mild. The team consistently makes the playoffs and is only getting better every year, so of course most players would want to be on the roster of a Cup-contending team. But to not be considered overrated the team has to go deeper in the playoffs, something I think all of us are hoping happens come April. “Overrated” is one of those words we Canucks fans hear quite a bit, whether it’s about our team or our #1 goalie (who was voted #1 in the same survey as the most difficult goalie to score on in the league). All we can do is hope to prove everyone wrong by going all the way.

There’s no hockey until Tuesday, so enjoy the rest of the All-Star break, Canucks fans!

Jan 302011
 

[Every Sunday, Caylie King looks at the Canucks week that was and the Canucks week ahead. You can follow Caylie on Twitter (@cayking).]

Canucks Record

50 GP, 31-10-9, 71 points (1st in Northwest Division, 1st  in Western Conference)

Who’s Hot

Alex Burrows is beginning to show signs of life. After a slow start – understandable considering he missed the first 10 games with a shoulder injury – he has 2 goals, 2 assists and a plus-4 rating in his last 3 games. As much as people like to say the Sedins make him better, Burr adds a lot to the first line. He gets into the dirty areas, fights for the puck along the boards and takes a beating in the front of the net in order to free up space and time for Hank and Dank.

Who’s Not

Raffi Torres has been quiet as of late, recording only 1 assist in his last 8 games and going minus-3 in that same stretch. Baby Beluga hasn’t scored since the Canucks’ December 31st game against the Dallas Stars – a 14-game goalless drought. Raffi recently spent some time on the fourth line; hopefully this kickstarts him and he finds his game soon.

Who’s Next

Tuesday, February 1, 2011 vs. Dallas Stars (5:30 PM start, away)

On Tuesday, the Canucks visit Dallas, a team they met just over a week ago. The Stars are 7-2-1 in their last 10 games, but one of those losses was a 7-1 beating from the Canucks. The Canucks have won both meetings this season, outscoring the Stars 11-2.

Loui Eriksson, who is second on the Stars in team scoring and participated in this weekend’s All-Star Game festivities, has 21 points in his last 19 games and 17 goals and 49 points this season.

Wednesday, February 2, 2011 vs. Phoenix Coyotes (6:30 PM start, away)

The Canucks roll into Glendale and take on the Phoenix Coyotes. If you don’t have tickets to the game yet, there’s plenty of goal-line seats left at $36 a pop. While at the game, get a beer, soda or hot dog for a $1.

The Coyotes are 6-4-0 in their last 10 games and are right in the thick of the Western Conference playoff race. They have an 8-2-1 record against the Northwest Division teams this season, including a 3-2 win over the Canucks in their only meeting to date. Former Canuck Taylor Pyatt’s 2 goals paced the Coyotes in that win.

The Coyotes are led by one of the best offensive defensemen in the league, Keith Yandle. Yandle tallied 17 points in the month of January; he leads the team with 44 points (8-36) and is a plus-4 for the season.

Friday, February 4, 2011 vs Chicago Blackhawks (7:00 PM start, home)

The Canucks have a Friday night date with their playoff rivals, the Chicago Blackhawks, this week. Despite an average season, they are 6-3-1 in their last 10 games and still hold 7th place in the Western Conference.

Chicago has won 2 of 3 meetings against the Canucks this season, though the Canucks shut out the Hawks 3-0 in their most recent matchup in early December. In that game, Tanner Glass scored the game-winner midway through the second period.

The All-Star trio of Patrick Sharp, Jonathan Toews and Patrick Kane lead the Hawks in scoring with 46 points, 40 points and 37 points, respectively; however they are a combined minus 11.

Most Deserving of a Shoutout: Lee Sweatt

When Lee Sweatt led the team out onto the ice, against Nashville, many were wondering whether it was a Canucks player or the young child that gets to skate out with the team. Then in one of the feel-good stories of this season, Sweatt, in his first NHL game, scored the game-winning goal on his first and only shot. If you are keeping score at home, his shooting accuracy is 100% for his NHL career. Although Lee only had 8:49 of ice time, he will get a bigger role in the upcoming games as Alex Edler is out for what is believed to be 8-10 weeks. To say losing Edler is HUGE, would be an understatement. But this is the time that our depth will be tested and young guys like Sweatt and Tanev will be given the opportunity to make a statement. Here’s to hoping that Edler recovers fast and is back in time for the playoffs!

Jan 272011
 

To fit Sami Salo back in the lineup if and when he becomes healthy enough to play again, the Canucks would’ve had some tough roster decisions to make to fit him under their salary cap.

That said, I’m pretty sure losing Alex Edler wasn’t their preferred option. Edler, who sat out Wednesday’s 2-1 win over the Nashville Predators, will undergo micro discectomy surgery on his back and will be out of the lineup indefinitely.

To say that losing Edler is a big blow to the team’s Stanley Cup hopes is an understatement. He’s easily been the Canucks best overall defenseman this season. Statistically, he is among the league leaders among all NHL blueliners in several categories: 32 points (10th), 5 powerplay goals (T-5th) and 24:23 TOI/game (17th).

Of course, it’s too early to tell how long Edler will be out for. In one tweet, Jason Botchford mentioned that athletes have come back from this surgery in 6 weeks, which would place Edler’s return near the end of the regular season. In a separate tweet, Iain MacIntyre mentioned a return date of 3-plus months.

Here’s hoping Edler’s return is sooner rather than later.