Apr 222010
 

As fans we get to see both the physical and the mental side of hockey. They phsyical side is one thing, but the mental side of the game has an impact that grows exponentially at times. It’s something that can affect the psyche of the home or the away team, and it’s something that can turn on a single play. It’s driven by adrenaline, it’s amplified by luck, and it’s the most fragile of factors in any game at any point in a series.

After the roller coaster game last night the mental game becomes more important than ever. The Canucks have seen just how hard the mental game is through their recent penalty kill trouble. There comes a point where the penalty kill becomes more of a mental battle than something controllable that the players can deal with. With more and more Kings powerplay goals going in you could see the Canucks deflate more and more with each power play goal against and you could see them panic. Then they killed a penalty. Then they scored a key goal. Then they won the game. All of a sudden things have changed.

The Canucks game four was a roller coaster emotional and mental affair for the players and for the fans, but as things changed in that game, so changes this series. The Canucks biggest mental obstacle was the penalty kill, their second biggest obstacle the road game. They Canucks head home in a 2-2 series, they’ve managed to settle their penalty kill, and all of a sudden the emotions are positively charged and the Canucks head home to familiar territory.

The Canucks managed to win a see-saw affair which was the hardest thing they’ve had to do so far. Winning that back and forth affair all of a sudden puts them in the right mindset to take on game five. The series goes back to Vancouver putting home ice advantage back in the Canucks court and they now have three chances to win two games. The Canucks have been a force to be reckoned with at home and with the benefit of the crowd behind them, a Luongo that’s making the big saves when he has to, and a tie game to start things from square one, this series is theirs again to win.

Apr 212010
 

Before this series started a lot of people expected a flaky Luongo and a Jonathan Quick who caved under the pressure of his first playoffs. If that’s what you expected you were like surprised to find Jonathan Quick lead the Kings to a 2-1 series lead heading into game four, and Luongo throw some respectable numbers up on the board. Throw away the debate that Don Cherry stirred about about whether or not Luongo is fit to be captain because there’s definitely no change happening any time this season.

Luongo had us all worried with his play after the Olympics and his play down the stretch but while Canucks look to find excuses for entering game four down 2-1 to the LA Kings, Luongo shouldn’t be one of them. They say statistics can prove anything and that’s certainly the case because if you look at Luongo’s line through three games his .880 SV% and 3.20 GAA average are not flattering in the least. What’s worse is those numbers don’t truly reflect the way he’s been playing. I don’t blame him for any of the goals save the soft one he allowed before getting pulled last game.

Take a step back to game two where coming out of the game Luongo had a .915 SV%. Luongo’s been on his game and he’s playing better than any of us expected, but certainly like we hoped. His save in game one on the goal line was the Roberto Luongo we wanted to see in this series and it’s the Luongo we got. Unfortunately, his stats have been a victim of poor penalty killing. While they say your best penalty killer has to be your goalie, there’s no doubt that he is not at fault for any of the goals allowed when down a man. He’s paid to be that guy but he needs the team in front of him to do their job too. Luongo’s only fault was the fourth goal he gave up to LA in game three before being pulled and even that isn’t a bad sign. The pull in my mind was a mercy pull, something to let him take a rest so that he can come back and win game four.

Looking at Luongo’s opposition, Quick in game three looked the most beatable he has of the three games so far. He’s not invincible, and he showed signs that his heroics from games one and two are fading. The Canucks can beat him and they have to use a combination of screens, an abundance of shots, and their power play to do so. The Canucks need to win this game, make it a three game series, and go back to Vancouver with home ice advantage. If they’re going to do it, they’re going to have to tighten up in other areas because Luongo (for the first time in a while) isn’t the issue. Luongo’s stepped up to bat for his team, now it’s time for the team to step up to bat for him. The Canucks are going to come out flying tonight and he’s going to be standing tall.

Apr 192010
 

With Alberts throwing the Canucks under the bus multiple times Saturday night at GM Place in the Kings and Canucks second game of the series it’s no surprise that he’s getting benched tonight in favour of either Rome or Baumgartner (Baumer if Rome isn’t ready to play). Now there’s no excuse for his penalties, they’ve been stupid, undisciplined, and untimely. They’ve been a result of laziness and hopefully the benching gives him the reality check that he needs to fix things should he see ice time again in this series, let alone the playoff run. Alberts is a big guy and he can be a monster physically, unfortunately his lack of discipline hurts the team much more than anything else.

Now I’m not condoning Alberts’ play, but one thing concerned me just as much as his penalty taking on Saturday. While the Canucks have dominated the play through games one and two, they’ve run into Jonathan Quick who’s surprising everyone. The Canucks quality of chances has been high, but Quick has stood on his head to keep the Kings in this series when they should have been blown out in game one and heading back to LA down 2-0 in the series. What’s worrying is that in game two the Canucks had four shots in the first period and five shots in the third period of the Western Conference Quarterfinal game. The Canucks were lucky to come out of the first with a two goal lead on only four shots, but in a first period where you need to set the tone, and in a third period where you’re gunning to break a tie game, you’re not doing yourself any favours by missing shots and coming away with shot totals you can count on the fingers of one hand.

Quick’s proven that he’s brought his A-game to the series and it’s in cases like this that you’re going to have to go with quantity over quality. Cliche’s are around for a reason and when they say “throw things on net, good things happen” it’s because it’s worked. Now the Canucks have had some outstanding chances, they should have walked away with a game one victory, but instead they won a close affair in OT. They key to tonight’s game is going to be more than Alberts being benched and staying out of the penalty box. The Canucks need to get more pucks on net. They have an explosive offense that seems to be in the right place at the right time most of the night, it’s just a matter of tiring Quick out and trying to force a large rebound to capitalize upon.

Apr 192010
 

It’s no surprise that Canucks fans were up in arms Saturday after the Canucks were beaten by the referrees that night to send the series down to SoCal with the Kings and Canucks tied at one. TSN had a great piece analyzing the call and after there was similar poor refereeing in the Phoenix/Detroit Game-3 there’s certainly some frustration from a lot of people with the zebras.

NHL Rule 74.1 states that if a player is within 5 feet of the bench and they do not play the puck then it shall not be called a penalty. It’s pretty clear that Bieksa is trying to get out of the way and it’s hard to argue that. You don’t see Vigneault criticize the referees in his post game presser too often, certainly not with such specificity to one call. He had due cause and it cost Vancouver the game

All that said, it was a blown call and at this point there’s no much we can do to go back and fix it. You can be sure that the Canucks will get more than a few calls going their way all night, but at the end of the day that does nothing to make up for a call that cost Vancouver a 2-0 series lead. The change in the psychological effect it has on the players alone is enough to feel robbed. The Kings feel they’re in it still and it’s Vancouver’s job to put that to rest in the next two games at the Staples Center.

The referees cost Vancouver the 2-0 series lead, but in the long run it could end up being a good thing. with all eight series seeing the first two games of their respective duels split 1-1, it’s not improbable that several of these series are going to go long. The Canucks have struggled on extra days rest all season so if they had swept the series that could have worked against them for the start of the second round. That being said, there’s a positive side to all of this (end even a YouTube Video worth watching). While the loss in game two means the Canucks will not get their second ever series sweep, it allows Vancouver to potentially win the series at home in game five. Not a terrible trade off I suppose.

%d bloggers like this: