Dec 172009
 

I don’t know exactly what happened between Vancouver Province writer Ed Willes and Vancouver Canucks GM Mike Gillis. I don’t know if Gillis spit in Willes’ coffee or ran over his dog or what. Whatever the reason, it’s obvious Willes has a beef with GMMG. And a beef he doesn’t try to hide either.

Take, as an example, what Willes said in a column this week.

The Canucks are 22 games over .500 since Gillis moved into the big office. They also have a Northwest Division pennant and a playoff series win. That’s all you need to know about his managerial accumen.

And that’s true to a point. But when you look at the roster this season, you wonder what the team’s record would be if Gillis hadn’t fallen into a made bed.

There are currently 13 players on the Canucks’ payroll who were brought in by Gillis and, collectively, their contributions to the greater good have been uneven.

His best acquisition has been defenceman Christian Erhoff who might be the Canucks’ best all-around blueliner. True, Erhoff was the result of the Canucks’ ability to take on his $3.1 million salary–along with Brad Lukowich’s ticket — but Gillis still gets credit for the move.

The rest of the list includes backup goalie Andrew Raycroft, defencemen Shane O’Brien, Matt Schneider, Aaron Rome and Lukowich and forwards Ryan Johnson, Tanner Glass, Steve Bernier, Darcy Hordichuk, Mikael Samuelsson, Kyle Wellwood and Pavol Demitra.

Now, before I go on, I will admit that I agree with Willes that the Canucks could use more production from the bottom-six forwards. What I don’t agree with is his constant insinuation that Gillis’ moves have been nothing but crap.

I think the consensus among Canucks fans is that the acquisitions of Ehrhoff, Schneider, O’Brien, Rome and Lukowich has helped give the Canucks one of the deepest group of defensemen in the NHL. As a group, they’re 6th in the NHL in goals, 1st in assists, 6th in points and tied for 2nd in powerplay goals. Sure, they’ve had their share of shaky moments in front of their goal, but Gillis’ moves to shore up the defense pretty much ensures that the Canucks won’t be calling up a Zach Fitzgerald or Patrick Couloumbe-type anytime soon.

I understand where Willes is coming from in that the forwards – i.e. Johnson, Glass, Hordichuk, Bernier, Samuelsson, Wellwood and Demitra – aren’t difference makers, but let’s put this into perspective.

The first three are fourth-line players, but they’re fourth-line players who do their job well. I don’t get Willes’ comment that “Glass is a nice pickup but, at best, he’s a third-liner”. If the intent was to criticize these pick-ups and compare them to bottom-six pick-ups by the previous GMs, then the more appropriate comparisons would be, say, Glass to Byron Ritchie, Johnson to Marc Chouinard or Tommi Santala, and Hordichuk to Jeff Cowan – I can’t think of anyone who would prefer to have Ritchie, Chouinard, Santala and Cowan in the lineup. If the intent was to criticize Glass for not being a more than a bottom-six forward, then I wonder if Willes expected Marian Gaborik on the fourth line. (For what it’s worth, Glass already has more goals now (4) than Ritchie had all of the 2007-2008 season (3); Glass is also a plus-7 while Ritchie finished a minus-10.)

The other four were acquired to provide more secondary scoring and I would offer that they have. Bernier’s on pace to reach 20 goals while playing mostly on the third line. Samuelsson’s on pace for 20 goals as well. I agree that Wellwood’s had a rough season and obviously Demitra’s still hurt, but remember that both provided some timely secondary scoring last year. In fact, the Canucks had five 20-goal scorers last year. (Giveaway time: If you can tell me the last time before the 2008-2009 season that the Canucks had five 20-goal scorers, I’ll send you a copy of the 2009-2010 Vancouver Canucks yearbook. First correct entry in the comments section wins.) This year, seven Canucks are currently on pace to reach 20 goals.

No one will deny that Gillis “lucked out” by inheriting a core that includes Roberto Luongo, the Sedin twins and Ryan Kesler. But while some would like to think about what the Canucks would look like if he hadn’t, I prefer to look at the team as it’s built right now. IMHO, the current version is a playoff team. Not a powerhouse team like San Jose or Chicago, but simply a team that it good enough to make the playoffs (and then hopefully make some noise). Whether or not some would like to admit it, Gillis has done a decent job of building this team and adding depth to the point that they can sustain injuries to key players like they did in the first couple of months of the season, remain in the top 5 in the league in scoring, and not completely fall apart like they did in the 2007-2008 season.

You know, the season when the Canucks had the same core, but obviously not a good enough supporting cast.

Mar 242009
 

The media did yesterday what they should have done on the weekend after Luongo’s comments on Hockey Night In Canada. They probed him about it, instead of simply taking his comments at face value and then sensationalizing them.

Iain MacIntyre (Vancouver Sun) and Ben Kuzma (Vancouver Province) both have pieces in their respective papers this morning.

Nothing changed Saturday when, during a Hockey Night in Canada interview, Luongo said: “First and foremost, I want to win the Cup. And whichever team is going to give me the best chance to do that is the team I want to be with.”

The quote incubated peacefully for a day until regular radio programming returned Monday in need of a topic to carry hours of chatter.

Is Luongo disloyal? Is he unhappy?

“Of course not,” he said. “I like our team here. I think we can do some damage in the playoffs. How that could be interpreted as me leaving, I don’t know.

“I think we have a team with a chance to win the Cup. At the end of the day, the only thing that’s going to enter my mind for the [contract] decision is winning. That’s why I play. I’ve played 10 years in this league and haven’t had much success. I think I’m deserving of having a chance to win the Cup, and hopefully that comes with Vancouver.”

I don’t mean for this post to criticize the media in this city. However, I find it funny that the original piece came courtesy of Jason Botchford, who, in his Twitter feed a couple of weeks ago, mentioned the slippery slope the mainstream media may be on by using player quotes directly from the Canucks’ pay-per-view telecast. It looks like the Twitter post has since been deleted, but in it, he pointed specifically to a Vancouver Sun piece that quoted Wellwood and Kesler from the PPV post-game show. In essence, Botchford did the exact same thing by quoting Luongo straight from the CBC telecast.

The fact is, unlike us Canucks fans, the mainstream media have access to the players on a regular basis. It wouldn’t have been hard for them to first ask Luongo about his comments before publicly questioning his commitment to this team (or goading Canucks fans to do so) and it would have been the responsible thing to do.

%d bloggers like this: